Yu.S. Kapustina, S.L. Belousov
Geology of linear seismic anomalies of Frolovskaya Formation
DOI 10.31087/0016-7894-2023-1-85-93
Key words: seismic data; linear anomalies; Frolovskaya Formation; local anomalies; Neocomian deposits; Lower Cretaceous; wave-dominated delta; clay diapirism; fluid-derived lithogenesis.
For citation: Kapustina Yu.S., Belousov S.L. Geology of linear seismic anomalies of Frolovskaya Formation. Geologiya nefti i gaza. 2023;(1):85–93. DOI: 10.31087/0016-7894-2023-1-85-93. In Russ.
As 3D seismic is becoming more widespread in exploration projects, interpreters begin observing anomalies of varying genesis. It is not always obvious what geological processes cause their formation. This article considers the possible causes of amplitude anomalies in the Frolovskaya Formation. The main attention is paid to linear anomalies which are not typical of Neocomian time interval and rarely found in seismic data. The authors put forward two hypotheses about the origin of these anomalies. Since the study interval is attributed to the shallow-marine depositional environment, the first hypothesis is based on visual analysis and associates linear anomalies with wave-dominated delta activity. In this case linear anomalies can be interpreted as alongshore bars and adjacent lagoons. However, the direction of the coastline in the Neocomian did not coincide with that of the anomalies in this area. Therefore, there is a contradiction here. The second hypothesis is the most probable. It is based on tectonic activity and associated with the secondary lithological changes or diapirism. It is suggested that under the influence of seismic vibration and anomalous strata pressure clays of the Frolovskaya Formation became plastic and filled cavities or voids along weakened or fractured zones. The study of possible reasons for formation of such anomalies plays an important role in seismic data interpretation, as the accuracy of the conceptual geological model depends on it.
Yuliya S. Kapustina ORCiD
Chief Specialist
Tyumen Petroleum Research Center,
p/o box 747, General Post Office, Tyumen, 625000, Russia
e-mail: yskapustina@tnnc.rosneft.ru
Sergei L. Belousov ORCiD
Expert in geology
Tyumen Petroleum Research Center,
p/o box 747, General Post Office, Tyumen, 625000, Russia
e-mail: slbelousov@tnnc.rosneft.ru
1. Gaifulina E.F., Nadezhnitsskaya N.V., Kapustina Yu.S. et al. Improving the accuracy of seismic prediction of the effective thicknesses of the Ju2 formation of the Tyumen suite on the example of the fields of the Tortasinsky block. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo. 2021;(11):28–31. DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2021-11-28-31. In Russ.
2. Atlas “Geology and petroleum potential of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra” [Atlas “Geologiya i neftegazonosnost’ Khanty-Mansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga”]. Ekaterinburg: IzdatNaukaServis; 2004. 148 p. In Russ.
3. Reshenie 6-go Mezhvedomstvennogo stratigraficheskogo soveshchaniya po rassmotreniyu i prinyatiyu utochnennykh stratigraficheskikh skhem mezozoiskikh otlozhenii Zapadnoi Sibiri. Novosibirsk, 2003 g. (ob’yasnitel’naya zapiska) [Resolution of the 6-th Inter-Departmental Meeting on the Review and Adoption of the Updated Stratigraphic Charts for the West Siberian Mesozoic Sequences. Novosibirsk, 2003
(explanatory note)]. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SNIIGGiMS; 2004. 114 p. In Russ.
4. Sokolovskii A.P., Sokolovskii R.A. Frolovskaya fatsial’naya zona neokoma Zapadnoi Sibiri v svete otsenki perspektiv neftegazonosnosti [West Siberian Neocomian Frolovskaya facies zone in the context of petroleum potential assessment]. Vestnik nedropol’zovaniya KHMAO. 2005;(15):64–69. In Russ.
5. Kontorovich A.E., Ershov S.V., Kazanenkov V.A., Karogodin Yu.N., Kontorovich V.A., Lebedeva N.K., Nikitenko B.L., Popova N.I., Shurygin B.N. Сretaceous paleogeography of the West Siberian sedimentary basin. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2014;55(5–6):582–609. DOI: 10.1016/j.rgg.2014.05.005.
6. Chernova O.S. Sedimentologiya rezervuara : Uchebnoe posobie po korotkomu kursu [Reservoir Sedimentology : Short Course Study Guide]. Tomsk: TSPPS ND; 2008. 250 p. In Russ.
7. Jackson C. A.-L., Grunhagen H., Howell J.A., Larsen A.L., Andersson A., Boen F., Groth A. 3D seismic imaging of lower delta-plain beach ridges: lower Brent Group, northern North Sea. Journal of the Geological Society. 2010;(167):1225–1236. DOI: 10.1144/0016-76492010-053.
8. Slovar’ po geologii nefti i gaza [Oil and Gas Geology Dictionary]. In: K.A. Chernikov, ed. Leningrad: Nedra; 1988. pp. 163–164. In Russ.
9. Belenitskaya G.A. In’ektsionno-osadochnye tipy sedimentogeneza [Injection-sedimentary types of sedimentogenesis]. In: Novye idei v naukakh o Zemle: sb. nauch. tr. VII Mezhdunar. konf. Moscow; 2005. pp. 124–125. In Russ.
10. Zhong S., Zhang J., Luo J. Geological Characteristics of Mud Volcanoes and Diapirs in the Northern Continental Margin of the South China Sea: Implications for the Mechanisms ontrolling the Genesis of Fluid Leakage Structures. Geofluids. 2021;2021:1–17. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5519264.
11. Koryagin V.V. Interpreting seismic record anomalies by iterative modeling. Geologiya nefti i gaza. 1990;(9):26–30.
Section: Geophysical surveys